Is It Grammatically Incorrect to Use I Want Over and Over Again
- English grammar
English grammar – Take & have got
- Written past Keith Taylor
- Final updated on 28 January, 2022
- On this page:
- Class and meaning
- Pronunciation
- Teaching ideas
Form & significant
- Have got and have are used to talk about possession.
- I've got a new house / I have a new house.
- Has she got a car? / Does she have a car?
- Have got and have are used to talk near relationships.
- Have y'all got a girlfriend? / Do you have a girlfriend?
- He'due south got three brothers / He has iii brothers.
- Have got and accept are used to talk about illnesses.
- I've got a bad cold / I accept a bad cold.
- I've got a headache / I have a headache.
- Have got and accept are used to talk nigh characteristics.
- Her office has got a nice view / Her function has a squeamish view.
- Why has he got a tattoo? / Why does he have a tattoo?
Boosted points
- Accept got and have cannot be used in the progressive form to express the meanings above.
- I 've got / have a headache – correct
- I'm having a headache – Incorrect
- have is more common than accept got when talking in the past.
- She had a pink guitar when she was 13. – more mutual
- She had got a pink guitar when she was xiii. – less common
- Did you have a headache yesterday? – more common
- Had you got a headache yesterday? – less common
Pronunciation
See the phonemic nautical chart for IPA symbols used below.
- In fast connected speech, assimilation occurs with got in have got when the following word begins with a vowel audio.
- I've got a cat: /gɒdə/
Keith is the co-founder of Eslbase. He has been a teacher and teacher trainer for over 20 years, in Indonesia, Commonwealth of australia, Morocco, Spain, Italy, Poland, France and now in the UK.
Comments
Need to get TEFL qualified?
Source: https://www.eslbase.com/grammar/have-got
have is passive, get is active. I don't believe the 2 words are uniform. You either have it or you lot get it. I got it yesterday. I have it today. Have got is a sloppy, incorrect use of a combination of the 2 words.
Reply
If you're a teacher the issue is simple;
If your text book is in British English (BE) you teach "have got",
while,
if your text book is in American English (AE) you teach "take",
still,
if you are not working from any text book you teach any your preference is.
Anyone who argues that "take got" is incorrect grammar is arguing that the Present Perfect Elementary is wrong grammer.
In Exist "got" is the the past participle of "get", nosotros don't use "gotten" that's an AE invention.
Answer
You're wrong that 'have got' is the Present Perfect tense. The nowadays perfect is used when something in the by is now relevant to the nowadays, like 'I've gotten the drinks – we tin can all leave at present'. "I have got a sister" is neither the present perfect not the by simple; it'southward basically (wrongly) using the form of present perfect to express a past simple meaning.
"Have got" is similar a kind of grammatical Frankenstein's monster, when yous recollect nigh it.
If yous say 'I've got this book that says…', that's acceptable (in spoken language), because 'got' still implies something that is relevant to the nowadays moment (like I'm going to tell you something interesting from the volume) and is usually something more than temporary. But to say "I've got a sister" is manifestly nonsense. It should be "I have a sis". A sis is something yous either have or don't.
Maxim "I've got a sister" is not only redundant (ane extra discussion) and violates grammatical categories (beingness neither truly past unproblematic nor past perfect), it also sounds ugly. Doesn't it grate on your ears? Merely constantly hearing the word 'got' (which is usually pronounced with a glottal end – like 'GOK'). Today I GOK out of bed yeah, and GOK to work so belatedly yes, and now I've GOK and then much work to practise yep, simply that's what nosotros GOKa do yeah…
I am a native English speaker, but when I went to England for the first time I was surprised at how much the give-and-take 'got' was used, and I was especially irritated past how people kept on saying 'I've got' when what they really meant is "I have".
I myself use 'take got' sometimes (maybe more after having lived in the U.k. for some time), only simply when in a situation where it's something relevant to something else in the present moment, and if it'southward something temporary rather than permanent – and I simply ever ever use it in speech communication, never in writing.
To the person who said that 'have got' is 'used naturally by nearly all native speakers' – that is but non true.
Reply
I hold with Kathy.
Reply
Thanks Kathy. And then the fact that accept got is used naturally by nearly all native speakers (I wonder if you yourself have NEVER uttered the words, "I've got to pick upwardly the kids from school") has no issue on your belief that it is "sloppy" and "incorrect"?
Reply
I've got to do something is dissimilar from the have got possession form, because the former goes with a verb and the latter goes with a noun.
I've got a headache. (a headache is a noun)
I've got to option up the kids from schoolhouse. (pick up is a verb) (verb phrase)
I've got a car or I have a auto is just a difference between BE and AE. The Americans tend to use I have and the Brits I have got. In the British sense, the got office could be seen as the past of get, and ways that you already have got something then y'all already own it, it is at that place with you now. Information technology suggests that at erstwhile or other you really went out and bought a motorcar for example, or that you have lived with 'a brother' (I've got a brother) for old.
We apply both forms all the time even so nosotros merely don't call back about it… in fact, if y'all offset thinking about information technology, you start to wonder whether it is correct, simply it is! You can say I've got a new business firm or I have a new business firm, it's the aforementioned thing.
Finally, gotten is an American affair… although in that location are similarities in the idea with the British have got it is used in the nowadays perfect in American English language… he has gotten himself into problem.
Answer
Information technology's non really and so much a case of BrE and AmE, I think. Information technology's more to do with spoken and written linguistic communication. We tend to write I have…, but say I've got… Withal, it is true that Americans say I have…, while British people say I've got… more often. Y'all can withal often hear Americans maxim I've got… and Brits saying I have… though!
Reply
Hello, I'm slightly worried about all the posts bashing the apply of have got.
I've got black pilus or
She's got a big nose.
These are both natural and perfectly right, Not sloppy and incorrect!
Past the mode – I've a machine is definitely a big no-no and something we would want our students to avert… I challenge the anonymous poster to find a credible example! Seems like some people need to re-consult their grammar reference books…
Just my 2 cents ;-)
Respond
If it is correct:
She/He's got a car
Or
Jane's got a automobile
Is it also correct or not if I say
They've got a machine
Or
James and Jane've got a car
???
Reply
Hi Raffaele
Yeah, these are correct:
"They've got a machine."
"James and Jane accept got a machine" (information technology'south not mutual to use the contraction for this one).
Respond
I always focus on the fact that the use of have and take got differs more in the grade rather than in the office – it's a grammar issue. I point out for example that have, like about other verbs needs an aux verb for the negative and interrogative forms and that have got doesn't. I as well like to highlight the fact that have got whenever possible should use short forms (I've got / he's got) and accept should ever apply the full forms (I have, he has, etc).
Reply
Howdy to everyone. We, English teachers in Espana, are suposed to teach HAVE GOT rather than HAVE and it is shown in all grammar books we utilize in our schools. I agree with Jon (two posts in a higher place) and with the fact that we utilise full forms of HAVE and short forms of HAVE GOT.
Reply
Paul, regardless if every American (myself included) is saying something incorrectly, information technology's nevertheless incorrect… and sloppy. Anyone who really paid attention in grammar class, knows that we Americans continually bastardize the English linguistic communication. Why is this a bad thing? Have a trip to the Usa Virgin Islands and see what happens when a language is left to evolve on it'south own for a couple centuries. You tin can inappreciably understand what the native people are proverb.
Reply
No way Jon, John and Lucia! Right on Tai! Nosotros should feel remorse for the ESL students in Spain and in many other places. English grammar strictly states that have got is incorrect and rightly then: have (pres) and got (past tense) should never exist used together or taught as a correct usage in English, regardless of its idiomatic usage.
The formula for amalgam this type of sentence is nowadays auxiliary plus by participle, not present aux. plus past tense. Jon and Lucia, practise you teach your students to say "Today, I have saw a car or I have ate a pizza, today?" Well, if not, and so delight don't teach them to apply have-present aux. with got-past tense verb. Even though I, myself, often use it for comic, emphatic or obvious, grammar-abandoning reasons, or, even, elementary laziness, I would never apply it in the classroom or utilise it when teaching, unless as an instance.
We Americans once learned this throughout simple, middle and junior loftier school. The declining of grammar usage is despicable and even pervades well-nigh of today'due south authors. Grammar is the verbal (linguistic) mechanism which helps to preserve the habit of forethought. Lucia, to respond to your quandary, "I've a car" is a possible, grammatically correct usage; however, it'due south pragmatically hard to imagine. It's foreseeable to be practical when many people need to sequentially state or affirm that they have something; however, communicating via writing, in itself, may preclude the to a higher place scenario and repeated use of I've an object.
Respond
Aaron–I submit that at that place is a deviation in meaning between "I have got something" and "I have gotten something". The first is a affair of present possession. The 2nd is present perfect, indicating that something has been received in the by. (as with your examples of "I accept seen a auto" etc.) Hence the question of what exactly "have got" is, and how to teach it… Y'all may simply exist correct that this mysterious phrase is but bad English, just I have my doubts. There are situations where it really does seem to be the more than natural utterance. (Q: "Hey! Where's my stapler?" A: "Oh deplorable. I've got it. Hither."—"I accept information technology" sure seems odd sounding in this case.)
And to Tai's betoken regarding the Virgin Islands and a 'linguistic communication evolving on its own', that's a living language for you. Unless you're dealing with a expressionless language similar Latin, information technology will go on to change, evolve, or devolve. Sorry. Language tin't exist permanently fixed in a grammar book.
Reply
Well, the British form is go-got-got and the American form is get-got-gotten. In my betoken of view, there's a great divergence between them. It´s clear that we´re talking virtually Present Perfect, which means that there's a connection with past and present. "I've got a car" (means that yous got it at a certain time in the by and you lot still have information technology) But, if I didn´t accept a car and I decided to buy one, for case, the right form at that time is: "I have a machine" and not, "I´ve got a motorcar" because there´due south no connection with the by, only with the nowadays.
Reply
We can utilise 'take got' to speak about something very personal, something we "owe" and 'have' for something that can't terminal, that is not 'ours'.
I have got blond pilus. (I was built-in with it, it'southward mine)
I have blond hair on my jacket. (where does information technology come from?)
I've got a machine. (it's a statement almost the object: a car belongs to me)
I have a car. (it's a argument almost an opportunity: I can get there, or I can drive you there.)
Answer
Yet a lot of snobbery in the English speaking world I come across. Accept got is a perfectly valid grade of speaking seeing how then many people use it. Information technology is not sloppy every bit it takes longer to say than but 'accept' and it is not incorrect as then many people use it. It is not present perfect either it is simply a special unique verb that has evolved. If you think it is incorrect you are apparently a snob, a moron or just not a native speaker. Language changes all the fourth dimension. Think about information technology.
Respond
I don't understand why people carp maxim 'I've got'. It's grammatically incorrect and longer and more complicated than only saying 'I've' or 'I have'. I think that Aaron explained it well plenty; there is no logical reason to say 'I've got' in any context, whether talking about the past or the present.
Answer
"I've got" as in "I've got a machine" is perfectly correct. You may consult whatsoever grammer book if you don't believe this. Information technology is very basic grammar and is rather shocking that some people on hither are non aware of that. It isn't a skilful idea to post something on here if you don't understand English language grammar. Some people may be refering to this for reference then please don't state something as fact unless you are sure.
Reply
Of course "have got" is a right form… there's no argument nearly information technology. It'south neither sloppy nor incorrect. It's rather worrying though that and so many people don't seem to realise this. Permit's exit giving advice on the English linguistic communication to the professionals!
Answer
I am new to teaching English, so this is fascinating for me! The one idea that immediately springs to listen (which i retrieve is a new one and not nonetheless mentioned) is that using have got instead of merely take is illustrating a grammatical tautology.
I have a car (grammatically correct) I got a automobile (grammatically incorrect just still conveys the data) I have got a car ??!!
I don't know whether usage of take got is correct or not. Simply i do know I but don't similar the audio of the word got!
If the English linguistic communication is going to evolve in this way, so be it – but it won't be anything to do with me!!
I like the explanation of the dissimilar implications suggested by cdelphine64…
Answer
I remember being taught at schoolhouse (in England) that to say I've got (I uncertainty any native speaker would say I have got?) is unnecessary, like saying I have have. If I'm attempting to be 'correct' I'll say, for example, I have a car but generally every mean solar day I say I've got a car forth with the bulk. I similar to retrieve well-nigh these things though, and I'd like to run into what others think… If I take the meaning of got to exist 'acquire', so I would use I've got to mean 'I've acquired'. And then it sounds correct to me. I've got a new auto, I like that! Plain I've got a car meaning 'I own/accept in my possession a auto', I'd rather say I accept a car. Personally, I believe both should be taught, as information technology is so mutual and people merely can't hold on which is correct. ;)
Reply
So to come back to the bailiwick – How do y'all teach have got? I make sure whenever pertinent, to mention differences between British English and American English. Adult students nowadays require more and more of that kind of knowledge in social club to not become too lost in semantics. Permit's face information technology, we are all exposed to both English. And a language, whichever it is, e'er evolves, exist that progression or regression, it just evolves with slight changes and adaptations here and in that location. Agree, too much snobbery here. I've got, I have got, I take gotten and I have are perfectly correct. The use of got is only one of those exceptions that became role of the language. That one form that's reminiscent to a nowadays perfect because of obvious reasons but that's actually more than of a present. I've a auto, though grammatically correct can easily be avoided since hardly ever used.
At the end of the mean solar day, you lot want to teach them practical English, and not by the book English. Unless you are teaching a linguist, to whom the intrinsic nature of these linguistic communication details might be important for whatever enquiry reasons. But and so once again, he or she would not necessarily enrol in an ESL course simply maybe something more challenging. My 2 cents is, we are here to help non native speakers acquire the level of fluency needed in today'due south demanding world, not to over complicate things and confuse them. Trust me: in business English, the simpler the improve, in whatsoever way imaginable, grammer, vocab, expressions, etc. Whatever not native who wishes to acquire a higher level of English, will never get for an ESL lesson with a TEFL teacher… trust me. :) I'm an accented non native language trainer, so… actually, my 2 cents only.
Reply
In the U.k., it's natural English to say I've got a motorcar for something y'all possess (no thing when you acquired it) or to express that yous acquired something recently.
I got a motorcar is natural for something you acquired any time in the past. We don't apply it as much equally Americans seem to in the slang-type sense of I have a car but, thinking about it, maybe I might to exercise without thinking about it. I'm pretty certain some Londoners with thick accents would do. Simply it'd audio like bad English.
I have a automobile is much more polite or well spoken and you won't hear it also much in the United kingdom, except in those circumstances.
I've gotten a machine, is something you won't hear too often. I know you lot'd say I've gotten a automobile (right?) just would you say He's gotten ill? Nosotros would not usually say that, but I'1000 sure at that place'due south a few who might.
With regards to I've a automobile It's some other way of proverb I have, which you say, then it's certainly not wrong, just it is used sometimes in what we telephone call 'posh' English and is sometimes used past us plebs if we're trying to make something sound more than important (maybe, more often, jokingly) "Don't tell me you've got a ticket for Bob Dylan?" "No – I've Two tickets for Bob Dylan.". No-one would say I've soup as a stand up solitary statement, but I'1000 sure some well spoken chap or chapess might say I've soup on my tuxedo/ballgown. Those people are human as well and so it is correct, whether you like it or not.
Aaron, I've a car may exist 'pragmatically hard to imagine' for you, simply then again and so is the 24 hour clock! (Sorry other-Americans, that was a sly dig, but only joking!)
Non trying to start a war, just simply a personal niggle here, aimed at Jeremy'southward "I don't empathise why people bother saying I've got. It's grammatically incorrect and longer and more complicated than but proverb I've or I have." argument. It'due south what nosotros phone call 'making the language more interesting'. Making something more complicated, or just having more bachelor options at your disposal, tin give language what is called… 'depth'. The sound of American English is really friendly and it's far from being a stupid class of the language, so don't reduce things to the level of "Let's use the simple-nigh form of everything and stick RIGIDLY to the rule book" or we might besides only phone call it a mean solar day and do "one grunt for aye, two grunts for no" and then but point at things nosotros want.
Respond
About "get" and "got", I hold with Aaron and Tai. "Get" is the verb in the present tense, "got" is the same verb in the past tense. To convey our bulletin we either indicate if we are in the nowadays or in the past. Either one, but non both together. "I take a common cold" is elementary enough. In answer to Claudia that is a good example of complicating matters, the Spanish language has that rule of if it's yesterday, it is said in one way, but if it's longer information technology's another word, and if it's very long, it'due south some other word. At present Claudia wants us to add together not only the past, merely if you still have it, or non, on meridian of all the rest. In my view "got" sure is in the past whether immediate or late past, or active or passive. IT IS IN THE Past. I call back the rule should utilize to all verbs equally. Just like give, gave, given, is get, got and gotten. If nosotros make exception for "got", then given will be if you lot gave me a nowadays at a certain time and I still take it, it's in the present, so information technology should exist "give", and if I don't still take it, information technology should be "gave". What kind of rule is this? This certainly has nothing to do with being a snob, I am in total agreement that language changes to accommodate people, new words are constantly added and needed. Furthermore, I personally retrieve that "got" sounds too much similar the discussion "gut". Personally I will notwithstanding continue to apply the word take, had and had, it sounds so much simpler and so much nicer.
P.S. Referring to Jon who is worried near the bashing of the word "have got" with his choice of words: "she is got a large nose". I do non think Jon should be worried anymore since he has simply made Aaron'south point of view very clearly, that when we mix a verb in the present and a verb in the past, no matter what the verb is, it will always come up out like: "I accept ate a pizza" and "I have saw a machine", and "She is got a big nose".
Reply
My dear fellows what a wonderfully orchestrated word you have merely had. Indeed a performance of much intrigue. At present Aaron is 'no dorsum of a clock' so to speak and was information technology Martin who stamped his dominance upon the foreign notion of the grammer verse in question taking on a verb besides. Oh my god. The horror. What a crime. Actually i was expecting someone to provide some educational activity ideas for 'have/have got' merely what i got was fantastic. I volition not explicate have/accept got as is too cumbersome and futile to go over once again and over again. The simply affair that fascinates me is that perhaps all of you are making a living out of teaching the English linguistic communication merely near of y'all fail to realise that some grammer points practice not obey the rules. I virtually laughed when someone tried to painstakingly deduce that 'the nowadays' is not allowed to go with 'the past' ecetera ecetera and what about the inclination of the 'nowadays perfect' being the role of this grammar point all along like from the very commencement. I nearly wet myself. It was comedy gold. Thank you so much.
Postal service scriptum: Why is English mispronouced in America. Again the phonetics are not derived from the look of the words. The language must be heard to be spoken. Is this a deliberate human activity of independence?
Reply
Have none of y'all (with the exception of Dr Moran, of grade) always heard of Swan's Practical English Usage? If you had you would run into that grammer is not a matter of correct and wrong, but of what people actually do with linguistic communication.
There are so many completely incorrect posts that information technology would be hard to know where to kickoff if it weren't for AARON's blaze of ignorance lighting the style. I beloved his formula:
"The formula for amalgam this blazon of sentence is present auxiliary + by participle, non nowadays aux. + past tense."
Problem is, Aaron my honey, that the simple past tense and the by participle ARE THE SAME THING FOR A REGULAR VERB – eg. work, worked, worked and in Brit English the past participle of 'get' is 'got', just equally the uncomplicated past is also 'got'. That'south just elementary ignorance of another form of the language, Just when he says:
"English grammer strictly states that 'have got' is wrong and rightly so: 'have'(pres) and 'got'(past) should never be used together or taught equally a correct usage in English, regardless of its idiomatic usage."
He is truly out on a limb since Information technology'S SIMPLY Not TRUE!
I've got a dozen or and so instruction methods that introduce I accept got within the first few units and got(past), it just shows he has no idea what a British irregular verb table looks like, (rather than for the US) 'got' is both past tense and past participle. On this detail point, the difference between Am and Br is simply that (British) IRREGULAR verb to get has a different past participle to the ane he has learnt. For united states of america got is both the past tense and the by participle. Has he always heard a British person use the by perfect expression I had gotten? Of course non = we had got, just similar we all the same accept got, a different fashion of doing it.
If you don't want to teach that the present perfect is also used to draw possession in this case considering information technology confuses you lot or considering you don't recall your students need to know that's fine. Please don't, however, say that English grammar strictly states that 'have got' is wrong and rightly so when that is just not the example.
Language can be used to draw reality from any number of different perspectives and the deviation betwixt I have and I take got is no more than than a modify of perspective on the same aspect of reality. When it comes to how to teach it, notwithstanding, that's an entirely different matter and I never did work out a satisfactory method. Some students just 'go it' and others, who mayhap share some of Aaron'southward less agile cerebral processes, just don't go it and never volition.
The English verb structure is based on the following binary elements:
Negative/positive
Past/non past
Modal/no modal
Perfect/not perfect
Progressive/not progressive
Passive/not passive.
By switching on and off each chemical element you can create all possible verb forms: I work = present – so in that location is no past, no negative, no modal, no perfect, no progressive and no passive, all that remains is subject and verb in the nowadays tense (although the total form however has an auxiliary which we volition need to utilise for past and negative forms – I do work).
By switching these elements on one-by-ane we can make the following constructions, non all of which describe bodily possible situations for any given verb, depending on the pregnant of the verb:
I work nothing = I piece of work (which is the same as 'I practise work')
I work negative = I don't work
I work by = I did work
I work by negative = I didn't work
I piece of work modal = I would work
I piece of work past negative modal = I wouldn't work
I work perfect = I have worked
I piece of work perfect by negative modal = I wouldn't accept worked
I work progressive = I am working
I work progressive perfect by negative modal = I wouldn't take been working
I piece of work passive = I am worked
I work passive progressive perfect past negative modal = I wouldn't accept been being worked (yes, honestly, you really can do that and it'due south still only i verb).
Obviously, all the intervening combinations are also possible (e.one thousand present perfect progressive 'I have been watching' etc.). The difficult part is conceptualizing the logical situations in which such constructions are necessary.
In the case of the present perfect used every bit a possessive – this is to KATHY in item – have is non inherently passive. A passive structure is ane in which the auxiliary to exist straight precedes a past participle (for example, the volume WAS WRITTEN or you ARE BEATEN) accept is neither a part of the verb 'to be' nor a past participle, ergo the just passive construction 'have' can be part of must exist a PERFECT PASSIVE structure (with or without modals, negatives, past tenses etc.) since yous can apply the accept to change be into been and and so follow that with a past participle, for example, I have been browbeaten – a present perfect passive structure, however, I accept beaten is merely ever going to be active because at that place's no part of the verb to exist in the structure. Indeed Kathy, exercise y'all actually know what passive means in this context? It ways that the office of subject and object are reversed. That means that the person or object that performs the verb comes afterward it non before (if it comes at all) and that the person or object that comes earlier the verb has that verb done to it. Very dissimilar from concept behind present perfect which controls the human relationship betwixt subject and verb over time, rather than the decision-making whether the discipline does the verb or has the verb washed to it.
You say: "You either accept it or y'all get it". "I got information technology yesterday". "I take it today." – Do you seriously mean I tin't become it today and I couldn't accept had it yesterday? That really is bizarre. Yous're confusing the verbs' semantic content (what they mean) with their usage in chemical compound verb forms as or with auxiliaries have can be used as both auxiliary and root verb, whereas 'go' cannot be used as an auxiliary. That's why you tin say I had had without Microsoft Word underlining information technology in red to advise that you delete the repeated discussion.
Are you guys really education English language?
The difference between Am and Br is only that our IRREGULAR verb 'to get' has a different past participle to the one he has learnt (that'south dissimilar too – he probably thinks he's learned it).
Reply
Why teach this every bit a carve up subject, when it's clearly most elementary present tense and nowadays perfect tense? The take in have got is not a mutual verb, every bit suggested by the first comment. It's an auxiliary verb, and the very ordinary auxiliary verb for perfect tenses. It doesn't have a significant of its own. I can't understand why you lot go through all the trouble of teaching negative and flexion in tenses and everything… when it'southward merely about following the usual, simple rules of verbal tenses, with mayhap one or ii exceptions.
Reply
Divide the class into ii groups, half the students are coppers, the other one-half witnesses. The police force officers are given a few minutes to think of questions to ask the witnesses about several notorious suspects. Each witness is given a color photograph of a different doubtable (male person or female, with bristles, moustache, brusk or long hair…). The witnesses must memorise the photo (younger or lower level students may take notes) and after a few minutes give them back to the teacher. The instructor sticks the pictures (preferably with other similar ones) on the lath (with bluetac) at the "police station board". Then each "copper" must detect a "witness" and question them near their "suspect". With the notes taken (well-nigh centre and hair colour, concrete traits, etc.) each "constabulary officer" must then go back to the board and endeavour to observe the pic fitting the description they got. The winner is the get-go copper to place the "suspect" and report to the "main" (the teacher). The "witness" must confirm identification. Action takes about 25 minutes (depending on group) My students loved it! As a follow-upwardly, students may invent details / a story about the crime committed by each "suspect", act out the abort, etc. You sure can come up with lots of ideas!
Reply
In Canada, we use both I accept and I have got. The difference between the two is unremarkably referring to a temporary situation or a permanent one. For example:
I've got some time
I've got twenty dollars (temporary)
I have two brothers
I take long pilus (permanent)
Respond
I've always thought of this as a Brit/U.s.a. affair, and it's foreign that people aren't aware of this. Listen to any Brit speak, and south/he will say accept got much more than have.
Also, an American will say both, merely will tend to say have more than have got. Certain dialects of AmE will also utilize the nonstandard I got for I accept, but whether this is an anathema or simply a facet of a non-prestige linguistic communication is another contend.
It's as well worth noting that Americans very rarely employ accept got in negative or question forms. I've got a car is usually heard here in the US, but take you got a car? and I oasis't got a machine, while easily understood, sound a scrap forced and pretentious to American ears.
Of class, both have and take got are used in the imperative sense, equivalent to "must." Interestingly, in AmE (non sure well-nigh BrE), nosotros seem to employ accept got in this context when we want to add together accent, for case: You have GOT to see this moving picture. You Have to see this movie works too, just it simply doesn't audio as forceful. Likewise, you'd near never hear the negative or question forms of have got used in this context (I don't have to get to piece of work today is common, whereas I oasis't got to become to work today doesn't sound quite right to me.
At the end of the day, both take and take got are acceptable, prescriptivist snobbery yet. In my feel English language learners aren't actually interested in these sorts of BrE / AmE differences (at least at the lower levels), and the exact subtleties of usage tin can get pretty convoluted. I would simply teach them both every bit equally correct ways of saying the same thing, only brand sure to be clear that have got can only be used in the present simple.
Reply
Information technology seems that some of y'all are of the stance that have got (to mean have) is just "lazy" and/or "wrong". Furthermore, it seems that no amount of evidence to the opposite would convince you otherwise. Seriously, delight stop spreading misinformation. It's your goddamn task to teach English as it IS spoken, not as you would have it spoken. English language grammar did non come down on freaking stone tablets from heaven. Information technology'southward what'due south embodied in the bodily speech patterns of the people who utilize English language, cypher more. (Side notation: Dissimilar speech or writing communities have dissimilar practices, and at that place are applied social consequences to following different standards.)
My personal approach to teaching have got (since that was what the OP was originally requesting) would be to say that information technology'due south just a synonym for the nowadays tense of have. Furthermore, it's usually realized in the contracted form, every bit in I've got style also much fourth dimension on my hands. In fifty-fifty more than informal contexts, it the "ve" can be elided and you get the (cringeworthy, to my ear) I got way besides much time on my hands. I would and then indicate out that the usage is primary oral rather than written, and that in essays or other formal writing, it would be better to use have (lest your essay be drenched in red ink).
P.S. In my (nifty-lakes US) dialect, at least, for I've got to exist the present perfect of get, it would need to exist I've gotten. Only my 2 cents.
Reply
Using have got when it means simple ownership is plain lazy. I'VE GOT A CAR vs. I HAVE A CAR….I Accept A Auto is correct. We have gotten lazy and laziness becomes the norm. I've got a car is easier to say than I have a machine. Try it, information technology is true. The incorrect version has been used and then often that even grammarians don't know what the correct usage is any longer. Linguistic communication evolves, and it often evolves out of constantly repeating an error. "Got milk?" This question is grammatically wrong. The question actually is Do y'all have milk? Have yous got cheating on your listen? Wrong. Exercise you have cheating on your mind? Correct. This error has become so commonplace that it has become acceptable. This is pitiful, really. This goes to show yous that anyone can change language by just repeating errors. What happened to rules? Someone has to know how to utilise grammar correctly, and correct grammar should exist used, specially in formal communication between companies and nations. Incorrect usage makes one await really, really silly.
Reply
Jane — "What happened to rules?"
Rules DID Non Come up Offset! Spoken linguistic communication did not, nor does not, come from or originate from rules. Rules are an afterthought……simply an attempt to codify a given linguistic communication after it has taken form. The only time the Rule Book can exist closed and set in stone is with a dead linguistic communication (or at least until nosotros find new manuscripts and new usages of dead languages.) As languages evolve, so practice rules. Imagine an English language Grammar volume in 500 years. I personally believe American English language will evolve into some form of Spanglish that volition dominate the mural.
I teach ESL to level 1 adult students attempting to learn to speak and understand English language. It is non a linguistic setting or grammar grade. Information technology is a class on conversational English. Therefore, I never, never innovate grammar into the equation when teaching have got. Why not? simply read this thread!… In improver, it is irrelevant to understanding what your boss is asking you. Yous gotta piece of work visa?
I have 2 post graduate degrees with heavy linguistic emphasis. I teach, written report and live an academic life. I am anything merely lazy… It is NOT Laziness to speak with shortened, grammically wrong words and sentences. The point is to convey understanding through oral expression…if someone asks me if I have a car, I typically say, Aye, i gotta car. My SOLE objective being to convey the idea of my personal auto buying. Shortening a thought in verbal communication is not lazy. It is efficient, effective and time-saving. Information technology allows for more than time to advance the conversation to new topics. It allows ane to audio similar a "normal" human beingness in informal social settings rather than a high-browed, elitist, academic stiff. Or peradventure to demonstrate non-lazy, verbal communication, we should respond, "Yep, I am the possessor of an automobile" Problem of accept, accept got solved!
Answer
It is simple equally I encounter it.
Have is used as a main verb for possession. Information technology is also used every bit an auxiliary verb in the present perfect.
Take got is present perfect, because got is (sorry Americans), the ordinarily used past participle of get in English English. Withal, distressing to disagree with everyone here, we English too sometimes utilise gotten likewise, and the meaning is slightly divergent…
Have got is used for conquering. We can use it to say I've got blue eyes, because the thought that nosotros acquired the colour, and the eyes, is mannerly, and kind of true, we have inherited them from our parents. The same is true for all kinds of instances where possession might seem, at first glance, to better conform the situation, and information technology may well be that Brits much overuse have got, and that have might oft be more than elegant.
Take gotten is used for the lengthy or troublesome conquering of something.
I've gotten my knickers in a twist.
He's gone and gotten himself arrested.
I've never really gotten to the stop of Ulysses.
It'south rare but we utilize it this fashion, and take been doing and so for quite some fourth dimension. Search Shakespeare (those of yous who say take got is just incorrect and for 'idiots', behave in heed you're calling Shakespeare an idiot), and you will find examples of have, take got, and have gotten, conforming with the usage I have described.
Reply
I detect it difficult to believe that in that location is an argument over whether have got or have is correct. Both forms are perfectly acceptable! If you've never gone outside the US, logically you won't be as accustomed to hearing or seeing it. I am American teaching English language abroad. Every bit a instructor, y'all should not simply recognize that dialects vary around the earth (in more than than only English), just you lot should most certainly teach this fact!
Accept got is not a "sloppy" mash-upward of ii words. It has the same pregnant every bit our accept, but information technology is treated as an irregular verb. Americans tend to use information technology less and simply do non teach every bit the correct form in OUR dialect. Proverb that it'southward incorrect is like telling a Brit that saying "at weekends" is incorrect (other countries exercise not say "on" weekends… or pronounce the letter "Z" as Americans practise, for that thing). The fact is that it is not wrong — it is just not what we are used to in this hemisphere.
Please, to those of you who are calling take got sloppy or incorrect, before you brand up your listen on the subject, delight do a bit of traveling (or travelling, in British English language).
Reply
I've got a degree. I accept it, I earned information technology, I achieved it.
I have long legs. I did cipher to go them, they are an innate role of my physiognomy.
He's got lots of money. He either earned it or inherited information technology, nobody has a fatty wallet on their person as they are expelled from the womb.
He has a nice personality. which would announced to exist an intrinsic characteristic.
To get – to obtain, to reach
To have – a verb of general possession
Reply
Interesting thread – I vaguely remember my former English teacher years ago wrinkling her nose disapprovingly at the utilize of have got in writing, just these days merely about everybody I know uses this form – and it is formally taught in all French schools to indicate possession I've got blue eyes, a blood brother, a big house etc. The older English form of the past participle, gotten, once used in 'English' English, at present appears to exist near exclusively used by speakers of American English, but I stand to exist corrected! In my stance, if enough people consistently employ a certain mode of speaking, this somewhen validates information technology – even if it causes the purists amongst us to shudder. Witness the more than colourful additions to the dictionary every year.
Reply
In all school books (for not-native speakers who want to learn British English), it is stated that nosotros should apply have got for possessions. Personally, I prefer have – a lot of people use it and for me it'south easier to pronounce. And so in my view, discussion most which is better, more proper, etc, is pointless. Nosotros can apply have got and have – both are pop and correct, and both should be taught in schools.
Answer
As it has been argued back and forth that both are apparently 'correct', I won't comment on that. Information technology's condign (getting?) BORING to observe out which is technically correct – which is what I came to this folio to discover. I actually tin't believe that there is no definitive answer in terms of a education rule (irrespective of everyday / common usage – which as we have heard, varies from location to location and course to form and education level to education level!).
What I will say though, is regarding Redundancy. Surely the point is to exist able to convey a message or meaning as economically and efficiently as possible (unless of course you purposefully want to add breadth and depth to your language for literary/poetic outcome). Therefore 'got' is redundant. Information technology adds nothing to the overall meaning, so go rid of information technology. Trim the fat – like y'all would an infected appendix. Americans seem to be more likely to do this trimming…
For a not-English speaker learning English for the first time, surely information technology is easier / more straightforward for them acquire 'I accept' rather than 'I accept got' (which opens up a whole complicated can of worms regarding mashed-up tenses and irregularities etc.)?
As an British/English native myself, I much adopt SAYING the (apparently) more 'American' 'I have…'. To me, it sounds better.
For WRITTEN purposes, 'I accept got a/some + noun' looks evidently wrong and clumsy, then I too prefer to write 'I have…'
It would be useful to know if students are penalised one manner or the other for these alternative usages – because to win the game, it helps to know how to play the game! I bet this varies from place to place, examiner to examiner!
Ultimately, I think it's of import to inform your students that both versions are unremarkably and widely used (and therefore acceptable) and that they should utilize whichever feels more than comfortable to them. Students need to be aware that both are used – because they WILL encounter them both!
Question: Is information technology more polite to reply to someone's question using the same form, for example:
Do you take a motorcar?
Yes I have a auto (or) No, I don't accept a car
Have you got a car?
Yes, I've got a auto (or) No, I oasis't got a car.
Would you mix them? Thoughts anyone?
End note: 'I take got to (do something)' is surely an entirely different use of language relating to necessity/imperative/must?
Reply
Discussion of "right" and "incorrect" grammar seems a bit out of place in ESL, whose task is surely to re-create usage, non to dictate it. However you may feel about the elegance or otherwise of "have got" versus "have", it's maybe worth noting that the one-time produces more understandable spoken English, equally Gs are difficult to slur. Compare the relative intelligibility of "We've no fuel left" and "We've got no fuel left". Could be a lifesaver.
Reply
whoa, I am a not native speaker, and really amused reading all these comments near yeah u can or no u can't. Why is information technology incorrect or why isn't it wrong to apply it… every teacher has a unlike opinion if u should or shouldn't use it. Americans say "take" English say "have got", both correct i guess in speaking, just use the one you similar, that'due south all, no ane is a moron for using 1 or the other, it is up to y'all. The funny function is that some people hither think that English language is the incorrect one to use. I have been living in UK for 25 years and no ane told me it was wrong and I accept spent fourth dimension in America also and no ane told me i was saying information technology wrong either.
Reply
we utilize have for animate, and have got for inanimate.
Reply
I agree with Stephen, "correct" and "incorrect" really aren't the way to get. "accept" and "have got" hateful basically the same affair, except when information technology's BrE and you're talking most what we talk near when nosotros say "have gotten" there is a SLIGHT difference in formality/politeness, non even worthy of explanation.
"have" is used for disease, sure, just so is "am/are/is having" (a stroke, a seizure, a migraine HEADACHE, a fit) – information technology's unusual to say I'1000 having cancer (what, this forenoon?) or I'm having a headache (delivered?)… but it's not wrong, peculiarly when plural (I'g having headaches, chills)
If y'all're non sure, so employ get "i'm getting, i got, i've got"
your lessons should be more descriptive and less proscriptive
Reply
Please aid me , which of the following sentences is right :
one- Do you ever have time to become to London?
2- Have y'all ever got time to get to London?
3- Do yous have fourth dimension to become to London this weekend?
4- Have you got fourth dimension to go to London this weekend?
I appreciate if yous aid me in this regrad.
Answer
Farid
1- Practice you ever take time to go to London?
This is right.
2- Have you e'er got time to go to London?
This is correct simply sounds less natural than the beginning sentence. One context where it does audio natural would be in this dialogue:
John: "I haven't got time to go to London."
Bob: "Have you e'er got time to go to London?"
Bob emphasises the word "ever" in his reply.
3- Do you have fourth dimension to go to London this weekend?
This is correct.
iv- Have yous got fourth dimension to get to London this weekend?
This is correct.
Reply
I don't have got a brother.
I take non got a brother.
which i is correct from the previous sentence.
I appreciate f you help me.
Reply
"I have non got a brother" is correct.
Answer
Take got slightly shows equally someone has recently got something. For example, Ive got a car suggests that I didn't have whatsoever automobile in the by and recently bought it or got it. Whereas I have a car means the person has already a motorcar and the time of getting the car is indefinite
Reply